State v. Sandifer
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
679 So.2d 1324 (1996)
STATE of Louisiana
v.
Edmond J. SANDIFER.
No. 95-KA-2226.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
September 5, 1996.
Richard P. Ieyoub, Attorney General, Harry F. Connick, District Attorney, Allison L. Monahan, Jack Peebles, New Orleans, for Applicant.
Kevin V. Boshea, Douglas W. Freese, Regan, Manasseh & Boshea, New Orleans, for Respondent.
WHIPPLE, Justice.[*]
We granted the State of Louisiana's writ of certiorari to determine whether La.R.S. 14:95(E), as applied to the facts of this case, (1) violates the Double Jeopardy Clause, and (2) is unconstitutionally vague. The trial court quashed…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- State v. BrisbanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
- State v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- State v. QuestLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
- State v. MansonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Morial v. Smith & Wesson Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.