Al Shimari v. CACI Premier Tech., Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Leonie M. Brinkema, United States District Judge
The issue before the Court is the legal standard under which plaintiffs’ claims under the Alien Tort Statue (“ATS”), 28 U.S.C. § 1350, will be analyzed for purposes of determining whether the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over those claims. At, the instruction of the Court [Dkt. No. 571], both parties have submitted briefs explaining their views regarding the appropriate legal framework. [Dkt. Nos. 576 and 577]. This Memorandum Opinion addresses 1) whether claims of torture; cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Sosa v. Alvarez-MachainSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Estate of Alvarez v. Johns Hopkins UniversityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2017
- Suhail Najim Abdullah Al Shimari v. Caci Premier Tech., Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
- Al Shimari v. CACI Premier Tech., Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
- Lima-Marin v. USADistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021
- Suhail Al Shimari v. CACI Premier Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2026