Legal Opinion
George A. Otto v. Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Company, No. 71-1436 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Parti
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 16, 1971No. 219Published
1Opinion of the Court
444 F.2d 219
78 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2998, 67 Lab.Cas. P 12,309
George A. OTTO, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HOUSTON BELT & TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 71-1436 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5 Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970,
431 F.2d 409, PartI.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 16, 1971.
Ben G. Levy, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.
Tommy B. Duke, A. J. Harper, II, Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellee; Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman, Bates & Jaworski, Houston, Tex., of counsel.
Appeal from the United States…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, Defendant-Third Party v. Marine Mart, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- National Labor Relations Board v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Local 990Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Otto v. Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1970