Legal Opinion

Grimsley v. Black

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 16, 1913No. Appeals, Nos. 175, 176, 177 and 178PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeals, Nos. 175, 176, 177 and 178, April T., 1913, by defendant, William H. Black, from judgments of C. P. Allegheny Co., Sept. T., 1908, Nos. 1017, 1018, 1019 and 1020, on verdicts for plaintiffs in cases of Ophelia Grimsley, Verona Sims, Phenie Tapp and Dessie Tapp v. William H. Black. Assumpsit on an agreement in writing.

Read the full summary

Appeals, Nos. 175, 176, 177 and 178, April T., 1913, by defendant, William H. Black, from judgments of C. P. Allegheny Co., Sept. T., 1908, Nos. 1017, 1018, 1019 and 1020, on verdicts for plaintiffs in cases of Ophelia Grimsley, Verona Sims, Phenie Tapp and Dessie Tapp v. William H. Black. Assumpsit on an agreement in writing. Before Reid, J. At the trial it appeared that plaintiff sued upon an agreement in writing, the details of which are set forth in the opinion of Reid,- J., on motion for new trial, infra. The defendant made the following call: Mr. Patterson: In case of Ophelia Grimsley,…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Notwithstanding the earnest and able argument of appellant’s counsel, we are of opinion that all the questions involved in these appeals are correctly and adequately answered in the opinion of the learned trial judge overruling the motion for a new trial.

The assignments of error are overruled, and the judgment in each of the above-mentioned cases is affirmed.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Furer v. May, Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Dinsel v. Pennsylvania RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Beishline v. Tatterfield, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API