Legal Opinion
In re Matthew FF.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 23, 1992PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.
In February 1990, petitioner commenced this Family Court Act article 7 proceeding against respondent, her then eight-year-old son. It was alleged in the petition that respondent was a person in need of supervision (hereinafter PINS) based upon a February 20, 1990 incident in which respondent restrained petitioner, his two younger siblings and a Chemung County Headstart Program caseworker in petitioner’s kitchen for some 40 minutes by threatening them with a tire iron. Petitioner also alleged that respondent had refused to go to school that day and that he became verbally and physically…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re Brian QQ.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- In re Richard C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- In re Richard G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re Jeremy L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Lisa S. v. William S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re Jeanne TT.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re Tyler MM.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Matter of Tina X. v. John X.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.