Legal Opinion

Wright v. Lee

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 7, 1918No. 9848PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Before Mauedin, J., Spartanburg, Spring term, 1917. Action by Wm. Wright against J. C. Lee and another. Plaintiff appeals'. cites: 25 S. C. 321; 84 S. C. 350; 69 S. C. 278; 16 S. C. 374.' cites : 89 S. E. 666; 16 S. C. 372; vol. II, Code of Civil Procedure, 1912; section 80, paragraph 12; 29 S. C. 31; 32 S. C. 171; 25 S. C. 385; 70 S. C. 294; 74 S. C. 71; Code of Civil Procedure, sec. 80, paragraph 13.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Gary.

This is an appeal from the following order of the Circuit Court:

“This matter comes on for hearing before me on appeal from'the Court of magistrate L. K. Jennings. There were several exceptions filed by the appellant, but I did not pass on any of the exceptions' raised, except the one relating to jurisdiction, for the conclusions I have reached make it unnecessary to pass on any of the other exceptions. In claim and delivery proceedings the statutes say: ‘The magistrate * * * shall issue a summons' with a copy of the undertaking…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rosamond v. EarleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
  2. Williams v. GarvinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Beard-Laney, Inc. v. DarbySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API