Legal Opinion

Pursiful v. State Road Commission

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided February 2, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clay

Reversing.

Otto Pursiful owns a residence and about two acres of land in Bell county, the title to which he acquired from James A. Pursiful and wife by deed which provided that the property should not be sold during the lifetime of the grantors. Through the property ran the old public highway leading from Pineville to Harlan. The Commonwealth and Bell county brought suit against Otto Pursiful and wife and James A. Pursiful and wife to condemn for highway purposes a small strip of land about eight feet wide near Otto’s residence and about twenty feet wide at the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gratzer v. GertisenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Village of Ridgewood v. Sreel Investment Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1963
  3. Henderson v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  4. State ex rel. Department of Highways v. MaloneyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  5. Kentucky Water Service Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API