Legal Opinion

Tanbro Fabrics Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 1976PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge Breitel.

In an action for the tortious conversion of unfinished textile fabrics (greige goods), plaintiff Tanbro sought damages from Deering Milliken, a textile manufacturer. Tanbro, known in the trade as a "converter”, finishes textile into dyed and patterned fabrics. The goods in question had been manufactured by Deering, and sold on a "bill and hold” basis to Mill Fabrics, also a converter, now insolvent. Mill Fabrics resold the goods, while still in Deering’s warehouse, also on a bill and hold basis, to Tanbro.

Deering refused to deliver the goods to Tanbro on Tanbro’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Walker v. SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Hempstead Bank v. Andy's Car Rental System, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  3. Sternberg v. RubensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. First Nat. Bank, Martinsville v. CroneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Bank of Utica v. Castle Ford, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Chen v. New Trend Apparel, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. Brookhaven Textiles, Inc. v. Avondale Mills, Inc. (In Re Brookhaven Textiles, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  3. Sindone v. FarberNew York Supreme Court · 1980
  4. American National Bank v. CloudCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Big Knob Volunteer Fire Co. v. Lowe & Moyer Garage, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API