Salt Springs National Bank v. Hitchcock
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
Plaintiff bank sued defendants, Hitchcock and Rubin, as indorsers of a $40,000 promissory note. Plaintiff, upon motion, has obtained a summary judgment for the full amount. The indorser Rubin has appealed. Our main concern here is the sufficiency of the appellant’s plea as indicated in the papers presented by him to meet plaintiff’s motion, viz., his answer, proposed amended answer, and the affidavits of himself and defendant Hitchcock. For unless upon all the papers plaintiff has made it appear that appellant’s denials and defenses are sham or frivolous, and that, therefore, a trial would be…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Thomas v. . ScuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Jamestown Business College Assn. v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Jordan v. . National Shoe and Leather BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- J. Rose & Co. v. Unity Stove Co.New York Supreme Court · 1955
- Stratford Credit Corp. v. Pettrone, New York County Courts1958
- Union Trust Co. of Rochester v. Mayer, New York County Courts1933
- First International Bank of Israel, Ltd. v. L. Blankstein & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982