Legal Opinion
McDonald v. Belleque
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 5, 2006No. 05C-15755; A129982PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief that alleged claims predicated on Blakely v. Washington, 542 US 296, 124 S Ct 2531, 159 L Ed 2d 403 (2004), and Crawford v. Washington, 541 US 36, 124 S Ct 1354, 158 L Ed 2d 177 (2004). We affirm without further discussion the dismissal of petitioner’s Blakely-based claims. See Lutz v. Hill, 205 Or App 252, 134 P3d 1003 (2006). For the reasons that follow, we also affirm the dismissal of petitioner’s Crawford-based claims.
This appeal arises from the allowance of a motion to dismiss; accordingly, we assume…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re M.P.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Peed v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. Sasha Dee MartinezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2013
- Carl v. Long v. C. Tony Wright, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2002
- In Re MP, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.