Commonwealth v. Bomersbach
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hoffman, J.,
Appellant contends that the lower court erred in failing to arrest judgment on the grounds that his demurrer to the Commonwealth’s evidence should have been sustained in a prosecution for obtaining money by false pretenses. We agree, and reverse the lower court’s refusal to arrest judgment.
The prosecution arose out of an investment plan proposed by appellant to the two complaining witnesses, William Duck and Clarence McLaughlin. Through an employee, appellant was introduced to Duck and McLaughlin, and, in a series of meetings, explained a business venture to them.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KelinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Commonwealth v. SiliaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Commonwealth v. MaukSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Commonwealth v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FeldmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. Dunmeyer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1977
- State v. EbnerArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. FeldmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.