Legal Opinion

People v. Gilbert

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 31, 2008No. 1-05-0414PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Brien

Defendant, Terrance Gilbert, appeals his conviction for burglary and his eight-year sentence of imprisonment. On appeal, defendant contends that: (1) the trial court erred by failing to question prospective jurors about their understanding of the presumption of innocence, the prosecution’s burden of proof, and defendant’s right not to testify or call any witnesses; and (2) the trial court erred by failing to order a fitness hearing. We affirm.

Defendant was charged with burglary. At the outset of voir dire, the trial court informed the prospective jurors, en masse, that defendant was presumed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. HerronIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  5. People v. ZehrIllinois Supreme Court · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. GrahamAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  2. People v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. People v. MagallanesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  4. People v. StumpAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  5. People v. SchmidtAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API