Legal Opinion · Dissent
Machules v. Department of Administration
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 25, 1986No. BH-184Published
1DissentZehmer, Judge
I respectfully dissent from affirmance of the order refusing to permit the appellant, Machules, to petition for review with the Department of Administration (DOA) under the circumstances shown by this record. Machules was represented by a lay employee of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) under a collective bargaining agreement covering his employment, and not by a lawyer skilled in the intricacies of administrative litigation. I am persuaded that the manner in which his employer, the Department of Insurance (Department), and DOA processed his grievance…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mrs. Roger McMillan REEB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY ATLANTA, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Samuel Culpepper, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Reynolds Metals Company, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Anne M. DARTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Smith v. American President Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.