Kowalski v. Kowalski
Appellate Court of Illinois
Divorce proceeding. Error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Theodore Brentano, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1905.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown
This cause is submitted on the brief of plaintiff in error alone.
His counsel makes two points. The decree must be reversed, he insists, in accordance with the doctrine of this court laid down in Rump v. Rump, 94 Ill. App. 582, as applying to divorce suits as well as other chancery proceedings, because the specific facts proven on the hearing and supposed to justify the decree are neither preserved in the record nor recited in the decree.
Secondly, he points out that the decree of May 10, 1905, in the Superior Court was erroneous in providing that the defendant should pay—not to the complainant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anderson v. StegerIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Lilly v. ShawIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
- Swift v. AllenIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- Lynch v. LynchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
- Rump v. RumpAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
3Cited by1 opinion
- Knaack v. KnaackAppellate Court of Illinois · 1927