Legal Opinion
Pennington Engineering Co. v. Houde Engineering Corp.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided December 16, 1941No. 2280Published
1Opinion of the Court
43 F.Supp. 698 (1941)
PENNINGTON ENGINEERING CO.
v.
HOUDE ENGINEERING CORPORATION.
No. 2280.
District Court, W. D. New York.
January 21, 1941.
On Rehearing December 16, 1941.
Luther Day, Leslie Nichols, and Ray S. Gehr, all of Cleveland, Ohio, and Max D. Farmer, of Buffalo, N. Y., for plaintiff.
Carlton Hill and Charles W. Hills, Jr., both of Chicago, Ill., and Harold I. Popp, of Buffalo, N. Y., for defendant.
KNIGHT, District Judge.
The complaint alleges two causes of action: one based on breach of confidence in that the defendant manufactured shock absorbers embodying plaintiff's invention after the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- International News Service v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Saxlehner v. Eisner & Mendelson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- White v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.