Legal Opinion

Eto v. Muranaka

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 2002No. 23296PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that an alleged tortfeasor not found in Hawai'i, who is a citizen and resi dent of Japan, was amenable to service under Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) §§ 634-35 (1993) and 634-36 (1993), and the Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters [hereinafter Hague Convention]. In the instant case, Defendant-Appellee Ryu Muranaka (Defendant) was amenable to service under HRS §§ 634-35 and 634-36 and under the Hague Convention, when that treaty applied. However, (1) the first complaint of…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Peter R. Ackermann, Dieter Schultze-Zeu, Dietger Feder, Detlef P. Eulitz and Karl-Heinz Lingner v. Ira LevineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  5. Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina v. State of S.C.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bank of Hawaii v. ShinnHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Garner v. State, Department of EducationHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Underwood v. Mercy Health Partners N., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. Kukui Gardens Corp. v. Holco Capital Group, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2008
  5. In Re the Estate of Graf Droste Zu VischeringSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API