Legal Opinion

Kimbal v. Travelers Insurance Company

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 17, 1942PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAPMAN, J.:

This case is before the Court to review a final judgment on demurrer in behalf of defendant below entered by the Circuit Court of Orange County, Florida. The plaintiff was an employee of Holly Hill Fruit Products Incorporated and suit was brought against The Travelers Insurance Company on a group life insurance policy. The terms of the policy protected the employee and in the event of death a certain sum was due under the provisions of the policy.

The amended declaration, held insufficient by the lower court, in part alleged that the policy was in force and effect until August 1,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beecey v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. State ex rel. West v. Florida Coast Line Canal & Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917
  3. The Franklin Life Ins. Co. v. TharpeSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  4. Baker v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Berry v. Travelers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Firemans Fund Ins. Co. of San Francisco v. BoydSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  2. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORP. v. OwensSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  3. Pottsburg Utilities v. DaughartyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  4. Couch v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  5. Peninsular Life Insurance Company v. HanrattyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API