Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Wilton Corporation v. Ashland Castings Corporation Ashland Capital Corporation Chimera Corporation, Keith A. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 18, 1999No. 98-6189Published

1ConcurrenceGilman, Circuit Judge

I fully concur in Judge Wellford’s analysis of both the merits of this case and the issue of sanctions. My disagreement is with the decision to remand the case to the district court for it to determine the proper amount of the sanctions.

There are two reasons to believe that a determination of the appropriate sanctions is an appellate question. First, Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure states that “If a court of appeals determines that an appeal is frivolous, it may ... award just damages and ... costs ...” (emphasis added). Fed. R.App. P. 38. The plain language of the rule…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morton M. Hill, Jr. v. Norfolk and Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  2. Nagle v. AlspachCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  3. Paul Ziah Dallo v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  4. Coghlan v. StarkeyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  5. Reliance Insurance Company v. Sweeney Corporation, MarylandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API