Legal Opinion · Dissent

Aetna Insurance v. O'Malley

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 17, 1938Published

1DissentTipton, J.

(dissenting). — I am unable to concur in that part of of the majority opinion which holds the final judgment of December 7, 1935, subject to collateral attack, and also that part of the opinion holding that the trial court had the power to appoint Messrs. Lauf and Cook only as referees and not as commissioners and custodians. I, therefore, deem it expedient to express my views thereon.

Appellant’s main reasons why the order allowing the fees to respondents should be set aside are as follows: (1) the order appointing respondents Lauf and Cook is illegal and void because Section 5874, Revised…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Abeille Fire Insurance v. SevierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  2. Aetna Insurance v. HydeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  3. Evans v. Farmers Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  4. Gray Ex Rel. Brokel v. ClementSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  5. Rivard v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1914

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API