Tindle v. Heiner
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
This ease centers around the word “transaction”— “transaction entered into for profit” — as used in the Revenue Act of 1918 (40 Stat. c. 18, § 214 [a] [5]; Comp. St. § 6336i/8g) in respect to losses allowed as deductions in income tax returns. What in point of fact is the transaction we are here dealing with? Was it one Congress meant to cover by this section? Viewed as an entirety the transaction involved is this:
In 1887-1888 the late Philander C. Knox bought ground in the city of Pittsburgh and built a residence thereon at a cost in all of $172,000. In 1920 he sold…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Morgan v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUECourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
- Nichols v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1929
- Phipps v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Larkin v. GageDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1928