Massengale v. Hicks
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARROTT, Presiding Judge.
Richard Hicks and Hicks & Associates, Inc., an insurance agency, have appealed from a judgment in the amount of $25,-777.07 entered in according with a jury verdict finding the defendants failed to procure a replacement insurance policy for the plaintiff. In this appeal it is insisted a verdict should have been directed for the defendants because there was no proof from which a jury could find there was an implied contract between the parties obligating the defendants to procure insurance for the plaintiff.
The pertinent facts presented to the jury are as…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Kristen Cox MORRISON v. Paul ALLEN Et Al.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- Ralph v. PipkinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
- Wood v. Newman, Hayes & Dixon Insurance AgencyTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- Harris v. AlbrechtUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- Bell v. Wood Insurance AgencyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.