Legal Opinion

Seekel v. Norman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 2, 1889PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Harrison District Court. — Hon. C. H. . Lewis, Judge. Action to recover an amount alleged to be due on three promissory notes. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment for defendants. The plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

In March, 1877, the defendant Norman purchased of the defendant Winch sixty acres of land situate in Harrison county. As a part of the transaction, Norman and defendant Williams entered into an agreement in writing with Winch. That recites that the land was sold for fourteen hundred dollars, on five years’ time, without interest; that Norman and wife had executed to Winch their five promissory notes and mortgage for fourteen hundred dollars for said purchase price; that in .consideration of a release by Winch of a mortgage on land in Nebraska, upon which Norman and Williams were jointly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lowe v. LoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  2. Seekel v. NormanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  3. Darling v. WestSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  4. Fisk v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  5. Seekel v. NormanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fishbaugh v. SpunaugleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. HamlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Hoy v. HeaverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  4. Boyle v. MountfordWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Mulvaney v. BurroughsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API