Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 2002No. 49A02-0204-PC-308PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTINGLY-MAY, Judge

Robert Smith appeals the denial of his amended petition for post-conviction relief, asserting that the post-conviction court erred when it determined consecutive habitual offender enhancements were properly imposed on Smith. 1

We reverse and remand.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In February of 1997, Smith was charged with possession of cocaine, 2 possession of marijuana, 3 and carrying a handgun without a license. 4 In May of 1997, the State moved to amend the information by adding a count alleging Smith was an habitual offender. In January of 1998, Smith entered a plea…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davidson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hendrix v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Starks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Madden v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Ingram v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Todd J. Crider v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Breaston v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Conner v. AndersonDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2003
  4. Springer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Breaston v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API