Legal Opinion

McPhillips v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided June 1, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion for reargument. Action by Patrick J. McPhillips, administrator of John B. McPhillips, deceased, against the Yew l"ork, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company, to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have been-caused by defendant’s negligence. The case was tried three times.

Read the full summary

Motion for reargument. Action by Patrick J. McPhillips, administrator of John B. McPhillips, deceased, against the Yew l"ork, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company, to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have been-caused by defendant’s negligence. The case was tried three times. On a< former trial, the turning point in the case being whether plaintiff’s intestate-had crossed and attempted to recross defendant’s track in full view of its1 rapidly approaching engine, plaintiff testified that he made a careful inspection of tfie scene of the accident a few days…

1Per curiam

The learned counsel for the respondent is quite mistaken in the supposition that the court misconceived the evidence in the record, and confounded the evidence on a former trial with the evidence on the trial under review. Having laid the foundation, imperative in the case of a witness not a party, but here unnecessary, the defendant introduced the testimony of the' plaintiff, Patrick J. McPhillips, on a former trial, as follows: “Question. „What is the distance * * * as to where the train was when he [the intestate] fell? Answer. Between the third pole, 277, feet from where he fell. Q. Did…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Egyptian Flag Cigarette Co. v. ComiskyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API