Legal Opinion
Seyka v. Corrigan
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 27, 2002No. 02-1079PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Bryan Jacob Seyka, a Michigan prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals a district court judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a). This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
On July 19, 2001, Seyka filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in which he requested the district court to issue a writ of mandamus to Maura Corrigan, Chief Justice of the Michigan Supreme Court. Seyka…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pulliam v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- De La Miya v. Branch County CourtsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2023
- Gray 128263 v. Michigan Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2025
- Hugh Mac Lane v. Village of Cassopolis, et al.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2025
- Jones v. DohertyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
- Rolling 91508-509 v. Unknown Part(y)(ies)District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.