Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kohnke v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 12, 1987No. 86-0988Published

1DissentCane, P.J.

{dissenting). I dissent. The Wisconsin Supreme Court has on numerous occasions held that property rights arising from the running of the statutory limitation period are entitled to protection under the due process clauses of both the United *90States and the Wisconsin Constitutions. See Haase v. Sawicki, 20 Wis. 2d 308, 311, 121 N.W.2d 876, 878 (1963); Maryland Cas. Co. v. Beleznay, 245 Wis. 390, 393, 14 N.W.2d 177, 179 (1944). This principle was most recently restated in State v. D.B., 137 Wis. 2d 57, 403 N.W.2d 434 (1987).

In this case, the limitations period on Kohnke’s cause of action ended,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hansen v. AH Robins, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Borello v. U.S. Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Haase v. SawickiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. BeleznayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Rod v. FarrellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API