Legal Opinion
Ruiz v. Ruiz
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided March 24, 1958No. 40726PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcGehee, C. J.
On September 23, 1957, the transcript of the sténographic notes taken in the trial court was stricken from the record on motion of the appellee Sally Bradford Ruiz on account of the failure of the appellant to give the notice to the court reporter to transcribe the stenographic notes of the testimony, as required by Section *1951640, Code of 1942, and the transcript of the testimony is therefore no part of the record now before us.
The giving of the notice to the court reporter to transcribe the stenographic notes within the specified period of 10 days has been repeatedly held to be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ivy v. RobertsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
- Shaw v. Bula Cannon Shops, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1949
- American Creosote Works, Inc. v. Rose Bros.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1951
- Ashe v. BallardMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
- Gully v. DunlapCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 1852
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mississippi State Bar Ass'n v. MoyoMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- Mississippi State Highway Commission v. BrownMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
- Altieri v. AltieriConnecticut Superior Court · 1959
- Leonard v. SullivanMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
- Southern Christian Leadership Conference, Inc. v. A. G. Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.