Legal Opinion

Baumgartner v. Harrisburg Housing Authority

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 7, 1994No. 93-7295PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOVITER, Chief Judge.

In the order that is the subject of this appeal the district court denied the plaintiffs’ request for attorney’s fees on the ground that, as a matter of law, plaintiffs could not be considered to be “prevailing parties” under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (Supp. III 1991). The court reasoned that the Supreme Court’s decisions in Farrar v. Hobby, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 566, 121 L.Ed.2d 494 (1992), and Texas State Teachers Ass’n v. Garland Independent School District, 489 U.S. 782, 109 S.Ct. 1486, 108 L.Ed.2d 866 (1989), require that a party must have obtained a…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. George Phillips Philip Vitale v. Borough of Keyport Victor Rhodes Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  4. Warren v. Reading School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  5. Richard Stomper v. Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 241Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API