Legal Opinion

Tully v. Tully

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 6, 2002No. 1D01-2966Published

1Per curiam

AFFIRMED. See Klette v. Klette, 785 So.2d 562, 563 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (“Appellant’s failure to provide either a transcript or proper substitute, such as a stipulated statement of the facts, defeats the appellate court’s ability to review either the factual or legal basis for the trial court’s decision.”); Mead v. Mead, 726 So.2d 865, 865 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); see generally Applegate v. Barnett Bank, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979).

BARFIELD, WEBSTER, and BENTON, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of TallahasseeSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Klette v. KletteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. Mead v. MeadDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999