Tully v. Tully
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
AFFIRMED. See Klette v. Klette, 785 So.2d 562, 563 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (“Appellant’s failure to provide either a transcript or proper substitute, such as a stipulated statement of the facts, defeats the appellate court’s ability to review either the factual or legal basis for the trial court’s decision.”); Mead v. Mead, 726 So.2d 865, 865 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); see generally Applegate v. Barnett Bank, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979).
BARFIELD, WEBSTER, and BENTON, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Applegate v. Barnett Bank of TallahasseeSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Klette v. KletteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Mead v. MeadDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999