Legal Opinion

Bishop v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1956PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Prewitt

The defendant below, Robert J. Bishop, was convicted of larceny and sentenced to three years in the State Prison.

It is insisted that the trial court committed reversible error in failing and refusing to instruct the jury with reference to the law of circumstantial evidence. It is conceded that all evidence offered by the State was circumstantial in its nature, hut the State insists that no special *430request having been tendered by the defendant or his counsel be cannot now avail himself of this error.

Our leading case on this subject is Webb v. State, 140 Tenn. 205, 203 S. W. 955, 15 A. L. R.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Turner v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Frazier v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Powers v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Gardner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Pearson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. BallCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  3. State v. TharpeTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Monts v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State v. ZirkleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API