Dorward v. Consolidated Rail Corporation
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TROUTMAN, District Judge.
The Interlocutory Appeals Act of 1958, 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), authorizes district court judges to permit parties to appeal an interlocutory order where the judge finds that the order involves a “controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation”. In the case at bar the third-party defendant requests permission to appeal an order denying its motion to dismiss and concluding that the Pennsylvania No-Fault Motor…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Gardner v. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Herbert Milbert v. Bison Laboratories, Inc., and the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Penn Central Corp. v. Checker Cab Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1980
- In Re Magic Marker Securities Lit.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Oyster v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Kolbeck v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- In Re Sandenhill, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Once Upon a Time, LLC v. Chappelle Properties, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016