Legal Opinion

Lipscomb v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 2, 1938No. 17529Published

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, Judge

The parties have stipulated that the situation of this case involves facts and principles the same as in the case of the Farmers Cotton Oil Company to the use of Choctaw Cotton Oil Company v. The United States, 84 C. Cls. 468. We think it unnecessary to repeat or add anything to the opinion of the court in the case above cited as reasons for our final conclusion.

If the plaintiff’s action had been begun in time this court would have rendered a judgment in his favor, but the remedy has been lost by reason of failure to file the petition within the period of limitations. All that the court can…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Farmers Cotton Oil Co. ex rel. Choctaw Cotton Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API