Legal Opinion

Tate v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 14, 1989No. 88-1405Published

1Per curiam

Appellant was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment for various violations of his probation. The original sentence was eighteen months’ imprisonment followed by one year of probation, or a category “3” probationary split sentence. See Poore v. State, 531 So.2d 161 (Fla.1988). Upon violation of probation, therefore, the sentencing judge was permitted “to impose any sentence he or she originally might have imposed, with *1128credit for time served and subject to the guidelines recommendation.” Poore, 531 So.2d at 164. Appellant’s sentence exceeds this limitation.

It was also incumbent upon the state…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Poore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  2. State v. AmicoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API