Legal Opinion

Cammack v. Young

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided August 7, 2024No. 5:23-cv-00052Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI WESTERN DIVISION GERALD CAMMACK, JR. PETITIONER V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:23-cv-52-DCB-ASH WARDEN HERBERT YOUNG RESPONDENT ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Harris’s Report & Recommendation (“Report”) [ECF No. 18], concerning Gerald Cammack, Jr.’s (“Petitioner”) Habeas Petition [ECF No. 1] under

28 U.S.C. § 2241

and Warden Herbert Young’s (“Respondent”) Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 12] for failure to exhaust and Supplement to Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 17]…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States of America and Robert W. Wallace v. Claude R. Wilson, Jr., and Modes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  2. Herndon v. UptonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API