Legal Opinion

Wilkolaski v. Hanavan

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLarkin, J.

This action is brought to recover damages for alleged malpractice by the defendant, a physician. On the 12th of January, 1925, the plaintiff’s right leg was crushed in an industrial accident. He was treated by the defendant, who apparently endeavored to save the plaintiff’s leg. After twenty-one months’ hospital treatment the leg was, on October 2,1926, amputated above the knee. While the allegations of the complaint are broad, plaintiff ’s *839affidavits and brief would indicate that the gravamen of the allegation of malpractice is the failure of the defendant to amputate sooner, with the result…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kellner v. KenerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  2. Lang v. LanzelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilkolaski v. HanavanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  2. Dalzell v. Rochester Transit Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  3. Finke v. Commonwealth InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
  4. Reed v. ReedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API