Legal Opinion

Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co. v. Alpena Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1908PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Mandamus by the Detroit & Mackinac Railway Company to compel Frank Emerick, circuit judge of Alpena county, to vacate an order awarding the custody of certain hides pending an action of replevin.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

This application arises from certain proceedings awarding the possession of property in a re*202plevin case pending in the circuit court for Alpena county, wherein the Alpena Hide & Leather Company is plaintiff, and relator is defendant. The suit was brought by plaintiff to obtain possession of three carloads of dry hides, of the value of $7,500, shipped to plaintiff at Alpena from Monterey, Mexico, by rail. There was a dispute between the parties relative to certain advanced charges against the property. Plaintiff claimed that the charges were excessive, made a tender of a portion, and sued out…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re School District No. 6Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Klatt v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Kerby v. Judges' Retirement BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Bailey v. Security Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API