Legal Opinion

McCormick v. Rossi

California Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1886No. 11096PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Placer County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C. C.

This is an action upon a contract

made by the plaintiff’s intestate for the sale of a mining claim to the defendant for the sum of six thousand five hundred dollars.

It is alleged in the complaint that the defendant had paid only thirteen hundred dollars of the agreed purchase price; that he had failed to work the mine as required by the contract; that the full amount of the purchase-money had become due; and that in consequence of his failure to pay the same he had by the terms of fhe contract forfeited all his rights thereunder.

The prayer "is, that it be “decreed that defendant…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. BachelderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Gonzalez v. HiroseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API