Legal Opinion

Stroup v. McNair

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 1972No. , 37 C.D. 1972PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Wilkinson,

This is an action in Quo Warranto brought by three members of the Senate of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to test the right of defendant to serve as a Member of the State Tax Equalization Board of Pennsylvania. The case is before us on Complaint filed and Preliminary Objections.1

The first ground for preliminary objection is that the Plaintiffs do not have standing to bring Quo Warranto. Defendant relies, on the line of cases that asserts that only the Attorney General, the District Attorney, or a person with a special interest as distinguished from the interest of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mayer v. HemphillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Creamer v. Twelve Common Pleas JudgesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Lafean v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Ritenour v. PeirceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Zemprelli v. ThornburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. STROUP v. KapleauSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Stroup v. SchonekCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Stroup v. KapleauCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Stroup v. LindseyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API