Legal Opinion

Riley v. Murdock

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided July 6, 1994No. 92-442-CIV-5-BRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

DENSON, United States Magistrate Judge.

THIS CAUSE is now before the court on the motion of defendant David H. Murdock for a Protective Order that the continuation of his deposition on July 6, 1994 not be videotaped, as noticed by plaintiffs. A conference call was heard on this motion on July 5, 1994 at which plaintiffs were represented by John T. Tierney, III, Peter T. Paladino, Jr., and Tybe A. Brett, the defendant David H. Murdock was represented by Jeffrey C. Howard, and the other defendants were represented by William C. Raper, Steven W. Coles, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Milwaukee Conncrete Studios, Ltd. v. Greeley Ornamental Concrete Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1991

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington v. CheneyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  2. Jeanette ROTOLO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. Alexander v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  4. Fanelli v. Centenary CollegeDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
  5. In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API