Legal Opinion

Fassl v. New York State Department of Taxation & Finance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 16, 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

Motion to vacate automatic stay denied. Memorandum: The motion to vacate the supposed automatic stay is denied as unnecessary. The filing of an appeal by the defendant from the order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint does not preclude Supreme Court from hearing and determining plaintiffs’ motion in the action for class certification. Plaintiffs’ motion is not a "proceeding] to enforce the order or judgment appealed from” (CPLR 5519 [a]; see, Spillman v City of Rochester, 132 AD2d 1008; Dublanica v Rome Hospital/Murphy Mem. Hosp., 126 AD2d 977, Iv denied 70 NY2d 605; Matter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Town of EsopusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Dublanica v. Rome Hospital/Murphy Memorial HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Spillman v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API