Legal Opinion

Addington v. Addington

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 24, 1988No. BQ-105PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BARFIELD, Judge.

James H. Addington, Jr. appeals the trial court’s judgment as it provides for support and use and distribution of marital assets. *898The awards of alimony, life insurance and use of the marital home are AFFIRMED.

The division of marital assets is REVERSED. The lakeside cottage, while built in part with the parties’ funds, was owned by the appellant’s mother. It was not a marital asset subject to distribution. There is no evidence of the value of the football tickets in the record. If the court intends to attribute some value to the tickets that value must have some record support.…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sheffield v. SheffieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API