Legal Opinion

Morrow v. Harkleroad

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided March 24, 2003No. CIV. 2:02CV142PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

THORNBURG, District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Petitioner’s motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) to alter or amend judgment. Respondent has filed a response. For the reasons stated herein, the motion is denied.

Rule 59 does not provide a standard for determining whether the relief of altering or amending a judgment is warranted. However, Fourth Circuit precedent has established three grounds for modifying an earlier judgment: (1) to accommodate an intervening change in law; (2) to account for new evidence not available at trial; or (3)…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Knish v. StineDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2004
  2. Schlotzhauer v. MortonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API