Legal Opinion
People v. Fett
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided July 23, 2003No. Docket 238781PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarkey, P.J.
Defendant appeals by right her conviction after a jury trial on a charge of operating a vehicle while visibly impaired by intoxicating liquor (owi), MCL 257.625(3), third offense, MCL 257.625(10)(c). Defendant argues that her Sixth Amendment right to counsel was violated when the trial court denied her pretrial motion to admit pro hac vice Ohio attorney Mark Gardner as her counsel of choice. We agree.
On November 10, 2000, defendant was arrested for operating a vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor (OUIL). The arresting officer administered two Data-Master breath tests at the…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. AkinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- John MacDonald, Jr. v. Thomas M. Cooley Law SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- People v. FettMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. FettMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004