Nacoste v. Brown
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Chief Judge:
Appellant, Jerome J. Nacoste, appeals from a July 16, 1992, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) decision which (1) found that a July 1980 BVA decision denying service connection for a psychiatric condition did not constitute clear and unmistakable error (CUE) and (2) found that no new and material evidence had been submitted to reopen his claim for service connection for anxiety with depression. The Secretary filed a motion for summary affirmance, in part, and for remand, in part, of the BVA decision. Appellant responded to the Secretary’s motion. This Court then…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Russell v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
- Fugo v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
- Lyle H. Prenzler v. Edward J. Derwinski, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Hamilton v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Henderson v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998