Legal Opinion
Grocery Outlet Inc. v. Albertson's Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 9, 2007No. 06-16380, 06-16448PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM Opinion; Concurrence by Judge WALLACE; Concurrence by Judge McKEOWN
2Per curiam
Grocery Outlet, Inc. (“Grocery”) appeals from a preliminary injunction granted in favor of Albertson’s, Inc. (“Albertson’s”), one of its competitors in the retail grocery industry. The district court concluded, at this stage of the proceedings, that Albert-son’s was the legal owner of the LUCKY mark for retail grocery services and products and rejected Grocery’s claim that Al-bertson’s abandoned the LUCKY mark through its publicly advertised announcement that LUCKY stores were converted to Albertson’s stores after a…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc., a California Corporation, D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Sardi's Restaurant Corporation, Sardi's Restaurant Services, Inc., and Vincent Sardi v. Lyle Sardie and Western Pubs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Electro Source, LLC v. Brandess-Kalt-Aetna Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
4Cited by55 opinions
- Herb Reed Enterprises, LLC v. Florida Entertainment Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- FreecycleSunnyvale v. Freecycle NetworkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Van HollenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Natural Answers, Inc. v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.