Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wampler v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 28, 2016No. 14A05-1510-CR-1606Published

1DissentMathias, Judge

[16] Because I believe that Wampler’s obvious and serious mental illness should have resulted in his civil commitment, not his incarceration, I respectfully dissent.

Facts and Procedural History

[17] The majority accurately describes the historical facts of this case. Even the majority’s version of the facts amply demonstrates that Wampler has always suffered from severe mental health problems. However, a more detailed view of the record even more clearly demonstrates the true extent of Wampler’s mental illness.

[18] This case starts in the early 1970s, when Wampler and K.S. attended elementary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Habibzadah v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. A.J. v. Logansport State HospitalIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Reginald Lee Robinson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API