Wampler v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1DissentMathias, Judge
[16] Because I believe that Wampler’s obvious and serious mental illness should have resulted in his civil commitment, not his incarceration, I respectfully dissent.
Facts and Procedural History
[17] The majority accurately describes the historical facts of this case. Even the majority’s version of the facts amply demonstrates that Wampler has always suffered from severe mental health problems. However, a more detailed view of the record even more clearly demonstrates the true extent of Wampler’s mental illness.
[18] This case starts in the early 1970s, when Wampler and K.S. attended elementary…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Habibzadah v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- A.J. v. Logansport State HospitalIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Reginald Lee Robinson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016