Dye v. Fryer

Lloyd, J.,

This is a rule to show cause why a mechanic’s lien should not be stricken from the record.

The motion upon which the rule was awarded assigns three reasons in support thereof:

“1. The claim does not show whether the materials alleged to have been furnished were so furnished in pursuance of a written or oral contract, nor with whom such contract, if any, was made.

“2. The claimant claims the sum of $310.56. In his statement the item ‘less other merchandise sold and delivered by claimant to Thomas G. Fryer, $125.65,’ appears without date or anything to explain it. It is impossible to…