Legal Opinion
Stuhler v. State
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 21, 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Herman Cahn, J.
Petitioners, by this turnover proceeding, challenge the forfeiture of moneys seized by the Attorney-General. The moneys were seized from a firm convicted of scheme to defraud, in connection with the fraudulent sales of a commodity. The moneys were seized from the firm’s bank account, and represent the proceeds of the firm’s activities over a four-month period.
In this turnover proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR 5225 (b) petitioners seek a judgment directing respondent to pay over certain sums of money to them on the ground that respondent possesses such sums…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Riggs v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Hofferman v. SimmonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Carr v. HoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- McClendon v. RosettiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Boyle v. KelleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. BenitezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- United States v. $490,920 in United States CurrencyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Hanrahan v. Albany County Probation DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- United States v. BenitezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985