Patenaude v. Anderson
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
There was a finding for the plaintiff against the defendant Studebaker in the sum of $2,233.00 on a count for breach of warranty arising out of the sale of a Studebaker automobile by Anderson.
The case was reported because Studebaker claims to be aggrieved by the denial of its requested rulings and the justice’s measure of the damages. The rulings are quoted in the. margin.
Studebaker’s position as presented by its requests for rulings is that it is not to be held liable for breach of warranty to the plaintiff with whom it did not contract and that Anderson was not its agent in making the sale.
T…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Commercial Credit Corp. v. Stan Cross Buick, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Essex County Acceptance Corp. v. Pierce-Arrow Sales Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Sherman v. Texas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
- Marsh v. S. M. S. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Linnen v. A.H. Robins Co.Massachusetts Superior Court · 1999