Legal Opinion

United States v. Daniel F. Aversa, United States of America v. Vincent Mento, United States of America v. William J. Donovan

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 13, 1993No. 91-1363, 91-1364 and 91-1574PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINIONS EN BANC

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

The government charged each of these appellants with criminal violations of the Bank Records and Foreign Transactions Act (BRFTA), Pub.L. No. 91-508, 84 Stat. 1114 (1970) (codified as amended in various sections of 12 U.S.C., 15 U.S.C., and 31 U.S.C.). Appellant Donovan was charged with, and convicted of, failure to file currency transaction reports (CTRs). See 31 U.S.C. § 5313 (1988). Appellants Aversa and Mentó were charged with, and convicted of, structuring bank deposits to avoid triggering currency transaction reporting requirements. See 31 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Bryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. United States v. BrandonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  4. Aversa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API